Breaking the 36MB RAM limit on the LCIII

Kai Robinson said:
Not really - some of us migrated entirely away from other forums when TD came into being :)
Click to expand...
Hence, the "have been" caveat, Kai! ;)

I've been having trouble finding much of interest back there in terms of development/tinkering with hardware since the mass migration of talent. Hope you folks don't mind my tagging along, hopefully a side order of crazy added onto the menu for this place is appreciated.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Kai Robinson
IMG_2263.jpg


It works! Just have to hope that simm will still fit in the case :)
 
  • Wow
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: trag, moldy, Jockelill and 7 others
Forgot to ask about the two wires on the layout. Couldn't see if they lead to addressing for a single or multiple Ranks. At first glance I'd thought you were powering that bloody big bodge of ICs, very clever way to implement the jumper wiring. Will you be adding the matched header to your Reloaded LCIII designs? Most elegant that I think.
 
Trash80toG4 said:
Forgot to ask about the two wires on the layout. Couldn't see if they lead to addressing for a single or multiple Ranks. At first glance I'd thought you were powering that bloody big bodge of ICs, very clever way to implement the jumper wiring. Will you be adding the matched header to your Reloaded LCIII designs? Most elegant that I think.
Click to expand...
The two extra wires pick up the two additional RAS signals form the bottom of the board, it's essentially just a custom quad rank SIMM

I hadn't thought of adding a header to the reloaded designs, I'll defiantly be doing that now :)
 
max1zzz said:
The two extra wires pick up the two additional RAS signals form the bottom of the board, it's essentially just a custom quad rank SIMM
Click to expand...
Thanks, should have figured out it was RAS from the way they run across the ICs as if P&G to the corners of the chips. Brain's only partially online lately, trying to shake off Wuhan Wooziness.

max1zzz said:
I hadn't thought of adding a header to the reloaded designs, I'll defiantly be doing that now :)
Click to expand...
Cool, at least some of my noggin's still up and running. ;)
 
Trash80toG4 said:
How goes it on this one? Is your board ready for prime time?

Haven't seen an update on any of your projects for a bit?
Click to expand...
retr01 said:
Yeah, I am with @Trash80toG4. I am wondering the same thing. :) The LC III is a nice Mac. Can it go to 128 MB like the SE/30?
Click to expand...
Well the boards work, I was going to assemble and sell a couple but my cheap source of DRAM IC's fell through and the next cheapest source is about £1 a chip so with 32 chips and assembly I would probably have to sell tham at £60-£70 each which I suspect is more than anyone would pay....

Really need to get around to uploading the board design to github (Along with tha IIcx and Plus boards...)

The LCIII can't go to 128Mb sadly as it lacks the 12th address line needed to get bigger SIMMS to work.
 
max1zzz said:
The LCIII can't go to 128Mb sadly as it lacks the 12th address line needed to get bigger SIMMS to work.
Click to expand...

Tangent to this thread on LC III memory expansion, for the 040 based such as LC475, P475, P476, Q605, etc., MicroMac did make a memory that breaks the 36 MB barrier. See this link:

MicroMac 64MB and 128MB BigSIMM Memory Upgrade SIMM for Macintosh

The MicroMac 64MB or 128MB BigSIMM memory upgrade product increases the memory capacity of certain Macintosh LC, Macintosh Performa, Macintosh Quadra and PowerMac models beyond the traditional memory limit to 68MB, 132MB or even more
www.micromac.com

Is this something that can be looked into (or discussed) in another thread? :)
 
Last edited:
retr01 said:
Tangent to this thread on LC III memory expansion, for the 040 based such as LC475, P475, P476 Q605, etc., MicroMac did make memory that breaks the 36 MB barrier. See this link:

MicroMac 64MB and 128MB BigSIMM Memory Upgrade SIMM for Macintosh

The MicroMac 64MB or 128MB BigSIMM memory upgrade product increases the memory capacity of certain Macintosh LC, Macintosh Performa, Macintosh Quadra and PowerMac models beyond the traditional memory limit to 68MB, 132MB or even more
www.micromac.com

Is this something that can be looked into (or discussed) in another thread? :)
Click to expand...
Would be very intresting to see one of those SIMMS and try to figure out what it's doing, I haven't ever seen one for sale though
 
max1zzz said:
Would be very intresting to see one of those SIMMS and try to figure out what it's doing, I haven't ever seen one for sale though
Click to expand...

You're right. Those come up rarely, if ever. I suspect it was not sold well back in the day due to its high cost versus standard memory, which was more affordable than the "BigSIMM" by MicroMac.

Maybe someone here or on 68kmla will have one? :)

Actually, 64 MB and 128 MB were later possible as memory prices went down. 64 MB and 128 MB SIMMs were installed in various 040 Macs. Many of those 040 Macs have the same boards for specific series. I doubt anything special about the MicroMac BigSIMM as it was a DRAM SIMM. The only issues were single or double banked and other physical constraints of those SIMMs which various discussion can be found elsewhere online.

If anyone knows otherwise, feel free to PM me. Okay, back on topic! :)
 
General maximum memory config info:
It wasn't just memory pricing, release dates of higher DRAM capacity/SIMMs plays a big part as well. Apple's maximum supported memory configs are based on SIMM capacities available and tested at time of release. Models were already obsolescent when higher capacity SIMMs/DIMMs hit the market . . . or Apple Marketing wanted to lead customers to believe so. ;)
 
Trash80toG4 said:
General maximum memory config info:
It wasn't just memory pricing, release dates of higher DRAM capacity/SIMMs plays a big part as well. Apple's maximum supported memory configs are based on SIMM capacities available and tested at time of release. Models were already obsolescent when higher capacity SIMMs/DIMMs hit the market . . . or Apple Marketing wanted to lead customers to believe so. ;)
Click to expand...

Yeah, I agree with those factors. And, I think that Apple did use the words "maximum RAM" in their materials, told all that to the dealers, etc. Many people believed in one big lie about the Q605, LC475, P475, P476, and other newer LC models, such as the 575, that could support more than 36 MB of RAM. :) Of course, people didn't see this as a lie, just simply the "fact" of the time.

However, I do perceive Apple lying to dealers and customers as a huge problem back in the day, and many people blindly believed and trusted Apple. :cautious:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back